Not a registered migration agent. General information only — not immigration advice.

My 173 visa expired more than 28 days ago — can I still apply for 143 in 2026?

Plain-language guide · general information, not immigration advice

Yes — but only through the narrowest of the three routes. According to the Australian Department of Home Affairs' Contributory Parent visa (subclass 143) official page (as of the July 2026 version), you can still use the two-stage pathway if more than 28 days have passed since your Contributory Parent (Temporary) (subclass 173) visa ended and you can demonstrate compelling and compassionate circumstances to regain your previous visa status. You must provide evidence, and the Minister must be satisfied that those circumstances exist. This article is general information about how the published criteria work, not personalised advice about your case — for your own situation, rely on the current official page and, if needed, a registered migration agent or legal practitioner.

What are the three ways to qualify for the 173-to-143 pathway?

The official page sets out three alternatives for applicants coming from a subclass 173 visa. Only one of them is open once you are past 28 days.

Your situation at the time you apply Can you use the two-stage 173-to-143 pathway?
You hold a subclass 173 visa when you apply Yes
You held a subclass 173 visa at any time in the 28 days before you apply Yes
More than 28 days have passed since your 173 visa ended Only if you demonstrate compelling and compassionate circumstances to regain your previous visa status, provide evidence, and the Minister is satisfied
None of the above No — the application is processed as a standard subclass 143 application, not the two-stage pathway

The practical consequence of the last row matters as much as the first: if the Minister is not satisfied, your case does not disappear, but it is no longer handled as the second stage of the two-step process.

What does "compelling and compassionate circumstances" actually require?

The official page states the test but does not publish a definition, a checklist, or a list of accepted documents for it. It requires two things: that you provide evidence, and that the Minister is satisfied the circumstances exist.

That means there is no published threshold you can measure yourself against, and no assurance that a particular set of facts will be accepted. To make the structure concrete: assume an applicant whose 173 visa ended four months ago because of a serious, documented medical episode that left them unable to manage their affairs. That is the kind of situation the criterion speaks to, but the page does not say such facts are sufficient — the assessment remains the Minister's, based on the evidence lodged.

What do you give up once the 28 days have passed?

Several practical advantages are tied to holding the 173 visa, or to having held it very recently.

Can you stay in Australia while the application is processed?

You can be in or outside Australia when you apply, as long as you are not in immigration clearance. The position during processing is tighter:

For an applicant whose 173 visa lapsed long ago, this is often the sharpest constraint: the decision may lawfully be made while you are onshore, but nothing in the published criteria keeps you onshore until then.

What evidence and documents should you prepare?

Because the document concession is tied to holding the 173 visa (or having held it within the previous 28 days), treat this as a full application.

What happens after you lodge?

Parent visa demand exceeds the places available each year, so applications are subject to capping and queueing and are processed in the order received. Assessment happens in two stages: an initial assessment to decide whether to add the application to the queue or refuse it, then a final assessment as places become available. The page notes that applications can take longer if they are incomplete, if documents are missing, or if information takes a long time to verify. If you need to correct something after lodging, the named mechanism is Form 1023 Notification of incorrect answers; you must also tell the Department about changes to your phone number, email, address, passport, relationship status or family composition.

Is there another pathway if the 173 route is closed?

The retiree pathway is a separate option with its own conditions: on 8 May 2018 you held or had previously held an Investor Retirement (subclass 405) or Retirement (subclass 410) visa, you have not held any other substantive visa between that date and the date you apply, and you are in Australia. Applicants under this pathway do not need to meet the balance of family test, do not need a sponsor, and do not need an Assurance of Support — but they cannot include children in the application and must maintain adequate health insurance until the visa is granted.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a hard deadline after the 28 days run out?

No further deadline is published on the official page. The criterion is not a cut-off date but a substantive test: you must demonstrate compelling and compassionate circumstances to regain your previous visa status, provide evidence, and the Minister must be satisfied those circumstances exist.

What evidence proves compelling and compassionate circumstances?

The official page requires evidence but does not list what qualifies or in what form. What can be said from the published criteria is that the evidence has to support the circumstances you are relying on, and that the Minister must be satisfied — there is no published checklist and no stated guarantee that any particular document will be enough.

Will I have to meet the balance of family test again?

It depends on which route you end up on. The eligibility page says applicants who apply as a Contributory Parent (Temporary) visa holder have already met the test, and the visa overview conditions that on applying before the temporary visa ceases. Clause 143.213(1) of the Migration Regulations 1994 frames the exemption around holding a subclass 173 or substituted subclass 600 visa at the time of application, so past-28-day applicants should verify this against the current official page.

Can I get a bridging visa while the 143 application is considered?

Not on the strength of the 143 application alone. The page says bridging visa entitlement is limited to Retirement visa pathway applicants, people who held a subclass 173 visa when they applied, and family members of subclass 173 holders. Otherwise you need another valid visa to stay in Australia, and must be outside Australia while the application is processed.

What if the Minister is not satisfied with my circumstances?

Your application is not automatically refused on that basis. The page says that if none of the three options apply, the subclass 143 application is processed as a standard application rather than the two-stage pathway — which means the full criteria and the full document set apply.

Can I be in Australia when the decision is made?

Yes, if you hold or held a Contributory Parent (Temporary) visa (subclass 173), or a substituted Visitor visa (subclass 600), before submitting your application. All other Contributory Parent applicants must be outside Australia at the time of decision.

References